Thursday, November 24, 2005

The scourge called islam

Does ISLAM really preach botherhood and love or is its teaching vile and vitriolic. Judge for yourself:-

Para 17 Soora 21 Ayat 98 :Lo! Ye (Idolaters) and that which ye worship beside Allah are fuel of hell. There unto ye will come.

Para 6 Soora 5 Ayat 51 : - O Ye who believe! Take not the Jews and Christians for friends. They are friends one to another. He among you who take them for friends is (is one) of them. Lo! Allah guideth not wrong doing fork. (In the beginning Jew Parsis and Christians were the target. After that the axe of aggression turned on to Hindus).

Para 11 Soora 9 Ayat 123 : - O ye who believe! Fight thosee of the disbeliveers who are near to you and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allah is with those who keep their duty (unto him).

Para 10 Soora 9 Ayat 28 :- O ye who believe! The idolaters only are unclean (Na-pak). So let them not come near the inviolable place of worship (i.e. Kaba) after this year.

Para 11 Soora UNUS Ayat 4 : - He may reward those who believe and do good works with quality, while as for those who disbelieve, their will be a boiling drink and painful doom because they disbelieved.

Para 11 Soora 10 Ayat 105 : - And (Oh Mohammed!) set thy purpose resolutely for religion, as a man by nature upright, and be not of those who ascribe partner (to Allah) (Worshipers of many Gods.)

Para 11 Soora UNUS Ayat 18 : - They worship besides Allah that which neither hurteth them nor profiteth them, and they say “these are our intercessors with Allah. “Would ye say ye inform Allh of something that he knoweth not in the heavens or in the earth ? Praised be He and high exulted above all that ye associate (with Him). It was this blind faith that prompted Kutubuddin and the class to destroy the huge observatory consisting of the twenty seven temples. Although he as not recorded about the destruction of the storage of books it can very well be imagined that he destroyed ever source of knowledge, which according to him was anti islamic. The ignorance, because of his faith, was so grave. He hated beauty in the idols too. Thus, what he destroyed was the observatory.
By breaking the idols he served the cause of Allah and by looting the gold and jewels he served his own cause of enjoying the wealth.

Para 10 Soora 8 Ayat 69 : - Now enjoy what you have won as lawful and good and keep your duty to Allay. Lo! Allah is forgiving, merciful! Booty included Women of “Non-believers”. They may be unmarried or married. The women were those whose husbands have been beheaded or those whose husbands have been held as captives. These men’s relation with their wives, comes to an end as per “islamic law”. The women become articles of booty. See, Quran Para 5 Sura 4, An-Nisa, Ayat 24. Also commentary Maktaba Alhasanat, Rampur, Translator Abu Saleem Mohmmed Abdul Hai, Third edition.

Para 26 Soora 48 Ayat 20 : - Allah promiseth you much booty thatt ye will capture …… It was a mere show that “He”, i.e. Kutubuddin “Constructed” a mosque out of the debris of the fallen temples. In his time the Vishnu Mandir was already there. After destroying the idols and making some changes he named it as Masjid-e-jame.
The 27 temples must have been with a conical pinnacle on them. Had they been adorned with egg shaped pinnacles, or domes, the destroyer would have retained them and, after removing idols and obtaining wealth deposited by the Hindu Builder in the past, would have boasted of having “built” 27 mosques!.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Good work Dear,
otherwise all the Hindus who are "educated" think that if they say anything bad for muslims and Islam then they will be prooved to be illeterate. i am highly impressed by your knowledge of the subject.

Anonymous said...

Nem hakim, khatara ye jaan - 'half knowledge is more harmful than no knowledge at all'.......better reason with eductaed peple about what ur thoughts are..and they will cal u blind..or selective mentality.indeed u have read the 'kutubuddin history' but have u not missed what hindu kings did when they conquered any region..in that period? or was it never so massive dat i could be ever accounted for..if not than read the history or greek n rome..and if u find anything better dat those kings did....u can liberalise urself as an intelligent protagonist and can justify ur claim against kutubuddin!

Anonymous said...

Nem hakim, khatara ye jaan - 'half knowledge is more harmful than no knowledge at all'.......better reason with educated people about what ur thoughts are..and they will cal u blind..or selective mentality.indeed u have read the 'kutubuddin history' but have u not missed what hindu kings did when they conquered any region..in that period? or was it never so massive dat i could be ever accounted for..if not than read the history or greek n rome..and if u find anything better dat those kings did....u can liberalise urself as an intelligent protagonist and can justify ur claim against kutubuddin!

Anonymous said...

You are on target on many points. Muslim conquerers have done some awful things. However, a clear minded person will not draw conclusion based on out of context Quranic verses and cruel fighters about Islam.

Zia Khan

Anonymous said...

Took me time to read the whole article, the article is great but the comments bring more brainstorm ideas, thanks.

- Johnson